Objection to Mutation (daughters left out)

Date: 13-11-2026

To,
The Circle Officer, Circle Office, Chakia, East Champaran

Subject: Objection to mutation only in the sons’ names, and request for joint record of all heirs

Ref.: Case No. 1245/2026-27

Sir/Madam,

I, Mrs. Sunita Devi, daughter of Late Rameshwar Prasad, resident of Ward No. 5, Bettiah, West Champaran, respectfully submit:

1. The land below was recorded in the name of my father/mother, Late Rameshwar Prasad, who died intestate on 12-03-2021.

   Land details

   Mauza Banjaria, Thana No. 214, Khata No. 112, Khesra No. 845, area 5 decimal (about 2,178 sq ft) Boundaries: North: road, South: Rameshwar Singh, East: lane, West: Mohan Ram

2. His/her legal heirs are:

   No.	Name, relation, age / status
   1	Mr. Rajesh Prasad (son)
   2	Mr. Mukesh Prasad (son)
   3	Mrs. Sunita Devi (daughter)
   4	Mrs. Reena Devi (daughter)

3. Mr. Rajesh Prasad, Mr. Mukesh Prasad applied for / obtained mutation only in their own names, concealing the daughters. I received no notice; I learnt of it from the online record.

Grounds:

1. Under Sections 6 (as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005), 8 and 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the Supreme Court’s judgment in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020), daughters are heirs equal to sons; marriage does not end this right.
2. Mutation in favour of some heirs without notice and hearing to all heirs violates natural justice.
3. I have not relinquished, sold or gifted my share; any such paper, if produced, is without my knowledge and must be inquired into.
4. Facts were concealed by giving an incomplete list of heirs.

Prayer:

1. record this objection in the case and give me a hearing;
2. stay or set aside the mutation proceeding/order in favour of the sons alone;
3. after inquiry of the family tree, open a joint jamabandi in the names of all heirs;
4. supply me copies of the papers filed by the applicants.

I verify that the above is true to my knowledge.

Thanking you.